Short Work Shifts Were Not Required Accommodation

Published by Steve at March 26, 2019

Tags

A plaintiff failed to persuade a federal district court that eight-hour work shifts would have been a reasonable accommodation when longer ones were regularly required and considered an essential job function.
Source: New feed 2

How to Legally End Mexican Work Relationships

Those ‘Best’ and ‘Worst’ Places for Working Women Have Some Things in Common

Short Work Shifts Were Not Required Accommodation

Steve

Related posts

FAQ’s

Washington State Adopts Wildfire Smoke Regulations

Labor Secretary’s Nomination Returned to White House